Newscorp phone-Hacking Speech or Presentation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

watchwordcorp phone-Hacking - Speech or Presentation ExampleThe issue here goes much beyond phone hacking and goes to the question of corporate culture, ethics, privacy, confidentiality and freedom of speech. Journalists are traditionally have a right to wonder and they are expected to report fearlessly. The Pulitzer prize of USA is awarded to such outstanding journalists. However, what Murdoch and his hacks accomplished was not an stag into illegal dealings but an expose into the private sorrow of deceased soldiers and murdered girls. Clearly, News potbelly went to a new low. However, some people have also blamed the news hungry e reallyday that constantly feeds off the cable television, the Internet and other modern media tools. Realty shows also find mellow viewership and in such shows, celebrities commit all types of behaviour that should not be actually shown on semipublic TV but which the celebrities want to be shown. In addition, there are crime TV serial publication and other such channels where the blur between acceptable and tasteless footage is very fineClearly, people intrust great pressure on the newsmakers, reporters and media houses to deliver and show something new and unique. TV ratings, advertisement revenues, salaries of people and pick of the media channels depends on the eyeballs that their content generates. Thus, journalists are under great pressure to deliver what the public wants. News potbelly had been hacking phones since 2005 and a large number of people read stories some of which were presumably written victimization phone hacks. It was only after that the journalists were caught that people were disgusted. Therefore, the audience is also partly to blame for creating a necessity for such tasteless stories. 3) Practical and realistic policy recommendationIt is clear from the incident of News Corp that ethics, moral responsibility and corporate culture of news media houses is highly questionable. The government is in a very t ight position. If it brings in regulations and imposes curbs on what can be published and what cannot, the whole media will revolt and word out against censorship, forgetting the main issue of phone hacking. At the same time, if the government does not do anything, it is incriminate of dragging its feet and of being held to ransom by a power media house.